Lucero

Lucero v. IRA Services, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 3, 20203:18-cv-05395California454 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Francisco Division LUIS HURTADO LUCERO, Case No. 18-cv-05395-LB

Plaintiff,

ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO SHOW

v. CAUSE WHY HIS RICO CLAIMS

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

IRA SERVICES, INC., et al., Re: ECF No. 90 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Luis Hurtado Lucero invested $350,000 in retirement savings into a self-directed individual retirement account (“IRA”) called the “Lazzaro & Associates five-year trading portfolio” (the “Program”).1 The Program allegedly turned out to be an illegal Ponzi scheme.2 His claims include violations of the federal Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”).3 Certain defendants (who administered the IRA) moved to dismiss the RICO claims, and the court granted their motion and dismissed the RICO claims with prejudice on the ground that the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PSLRA”) barred them.4 The same

25 1 Second Am. Compl. (“SAC”) − ECF No. 90 at 2 (¶…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.