Panchumarthi

Calsoft Labs, Inc. v. Panchumarthi

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 20205:19-cv-04398California7,593 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 CALSOFT LABS, INC., et al., Case No. 19-cv-04398-NC 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS VENKATA PANCHUMARTHI, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 31 Defendants. 15 16 Defendants Venkata Panchumarthi and Truinfo Technologies, Inc. move to dismiss plaintiff Calsoft Labs, Inc. and PVR Technologies, Inc.’s second amended complaint. See Dkt. No. 31. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendants’ motion to dismiss. Because much of Plaintiffs’ second amended complaint mirrors its first amended complaint, dismissal is largely without leave to amend. I. Background A. Factual Allegations in the Second Amended Complaint In February 2016, Calsoft, a technology company, purchased PVR from Panchumarthi. See Dkt. No. 27 (“SAC”) ¶ 14. At the same time,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.