Carlson

Carlson v. Clapper

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 3, 20205:18-cv-07195-VKDCalifornia6,474 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

1 A. Factual Background 2 According to the operative complaint, Craig Carlson is a resident of Chicago, Illinois and 3 the sole member of Carlson Produce, a limited liability company organized under the laws of 4 Illinois with its principal place of business in Illinois. Dkt. No. 27 ¶¶ 4-5, 17. Mr. Carlson 5 specializes in creating and managing high performance hardware and software products for 6 companies in the produce supply industry. Id. ¶ 14. 7 ScanX is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in California. Id. 8 ¶¶ 6-8. ScanX develops instruments for “real-time” detection of bacteria and chemicals in food. 9 Id. ¶ 13. Mr. Clapper is a California resident and the President, Chairman, and controlling 10 shareholder of ScanX. Id. ¶ 6. 11 On July 1, 2016, ScanX and Carlson Produce entered into a four-year Services 12 Agreement. Id. ¶ 16; Dkt. No. 66-1, Ex. A. The Services Agreement identifies Carlson Produce 13 as “Consultant” and ScanX as “Company.” Dkt. No. 66-1, Ex. A at 1. Pursuant to this agreement, 14 “Consultant will be taking the title of President of Sales and Marketing for ScanX Inc. 15 Responsibilities include all…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.