Discord, Inc. v. Discord Sound

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 4, 20204:19-cv-05824California1,517 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DISCORD, INC., Case No. 19-cv-05824-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

ALTERNATIVE SERVICE

v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 7, 11, 12 DISCORD SOUND, et al., Defendants.

12 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Discord, Inc.’s Motion for Order Allowing Alternative Service. See Dkt. No. 7. The Court held a case management conference on December 17, 2019, and directed Plaintiff to file supplemental declarations, including (1) the email exchanges between counsel and Defendants Chun Hin Chan and Discord Sound; and (2) the efforts the private investigator took to locate an address for Defendants. See Dkt. No. 10. Having reviewed the supplemental declarations, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion for alternative service. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed this trademark action on September 19, 2019, regarding its Discord app for computers and phones. See Dkt. No. 1. Plaintiff alleges that Defendants have infringed Plaintiff’s Discord…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.