Kayvan

Kayvan v. Pompeo

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 4, 20205:19-cv-08071California1,255 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 GISELLE KAYVAN, et al., Case No. 5:19-cv-08071-EJD Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING EX PARTE v. APPLICATION FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY MICHAEL R. POMPEO, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 17 Defendants.

On December 10, 2019, Plaintiffs filed this action against Defendants, alleging that Defendants were improperly withholding adjudications of case-by-case waivers under Presidential Proclamation 9645, Enhancing Vetting Capabilities and Processes for Detecting Attempted Entry into the United States by Terrorists or Other Public-Safety Threats (“PP 9645”). On December 26, 2019, Plaintiffs filed a motion for preliminary injunction (Dkt. No. 7), which pursuant to stipulation, is scheduled to be heard on February 13, 2020 (Dkt. No. 15). Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ ex parte application for expedited discovery. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.