Alderman

Alderman v. City of Cotati

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 4, 20204:19-cv-05844California3,639 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LAURIE ELIZABETH ALDERMAN, Case No. 19-cv-05844-KAW

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO DISMISS

CITY OF COTATI, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 14 Defendants.

12 On September 19, 2019, Plaintiff Laurie Elizabeth Alderman filed the instant action against Defendants, asserting violations of her free speech rights and the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”). (Compl., Dkt. No. 1.) Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss, strike, and for a more definitive statement of the complaint. (Defs.’ Mot. to Dismiss, Dkt. No. 14.) Upon review of the moving papers, the Court finds this matter suitable for resolution without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), and, for the reasons set forth below, GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendants’ motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff is a resident of Defendant City of Cotati…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.