Becton, Dickinson and Company v. Cytek Biosciences Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 4, 20203:18-cv-00933California417 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11 12 BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY, ) C.A. No. 3:18–cv–00933–MMC ) Plaintiff / Defendant–in–Counterclaim, ) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING IN ) PART UNOPPOSED ADMINISTRATIVE v. ) MOTION TO SEAL PORTIONS OF ) PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO

CYTEK BIOSCIENCES INC., MING YAN, ) CYTEK’S MOTION TO DISMISS;

16 ALFRED RILEY, DAVID VRANE, ) DIRECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF

ZHENYU ZHANG, ZHENXIANG GONG, )

17 ALEX ZHONG, MARIA JAIMES, GIL ) REININ, and JANELLE SHOOK, ) ) Defendants / Plaintiff–in–Counterclaim. ) ) 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff Becton, Dickinson and Company’s (“BD”) Unopposed Administrative Motion to 2|| Seal Portions of BD’s Opposition to Cytek’s Motion to Dismiss (the “Opposition”) was brought 3|| before this Court. Upon consideration of the Administrative Motion and the supporting documents submitted therewith, as well as the declaration of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.