Priast
Priast v. Nieman Marcus Group, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 FELIPE A. PRIAST, Case No. 19-cv-07304-EMC
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
v. MOTION TO VACATE ARBITRATION
AWARD
NEIMAN MARCUS GROUP, INC., Docket No. 1 Defendant.
12 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff is Felipe A. Priast (“Mr. Priast” or “Plaintiff”), is a former employee of Defendant, Nieman Marcus Group, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Neiman Marcus”). Mr. Priast brought claims against Defendant alleging sexual harassment and stereotype discrimination in an arbitration procedure administered by JAMS. He now seeks an order from the Court vacating the arbitration award. Because the Court finds that there is no arbitration award to vacate, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion to Vacate Arbitration Award. II. BACKGROUND Plaintiff alleges as follows. “While working at Neiman Marcus LLC as a Sales Representative between October 26, 2016 and February 22, 2017, Stanford, CA,…