Sumotext Corp. -v- Zoove, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 3, 20205:16-cv-01370California8,779 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 SUMOTEXT CORP., Case No. 16-cv-01370-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE MOTIONS IN LIMINE

v. [Re: ECF 384, 385, 386, 387, 388, 390, ZOOVE, INC., et al., 391, 392] Defendants.

12 Plaintiff Sumotext Corporation (“Sumotext”) brings this suit against Defendants Zoove, 13 Inc. (“Zoove”), Virtual Hold Technology LLC (“VHT”), VHT StarStar, and StarSteve, LLC 14 (“StarSteve”), alleging that Defendants have violated the federal antitrust laws in connection with 15 the leasing and servicing of “StarStar numbers.” After substantial motion practice, two claims 16 remain in the operative third amended complaint (“TAC”): Count IV for restraint of trade in 17 violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, and Count V for conspiracy to monopolize and 18 monopolization in violation of Section 2 of the Sherman Act. Trial in this case is scheduled to 19 begin on February 24, 2020. 20 On January 16, 2020, in advance of the Final Pretrial Conference, Defendants jointly…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.