Dulberg

Dulberg v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 5, 20203:17-cv-00850California2,518 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARTIN DULBERG, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, No. C 17-00850 WHA Plaintiff,

v.

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., and AMENDMENT OF JUDGMENT RAISER, LLC, Defendants.

16 INTRODUCTION In this settled class action, plaintiff moves for amendment of the judgment pursuant to Rule 56(e) or for relief from judgment under Rule 60(b) on an issue decided twice before. No newly discoverable evidence is presented, no judicial mistake shown, no law changed, and no other justification for extraordinary relief made. The motion is DENIED. STATEMENT Prior orders detail the facts of the case and the history of settlement proposals (see, e.g., Dkt. Nos. 52, 169). Briefly, an order certified the class in February 2018. Six months later, plaintiff moved for preliminary approval of a class settlement. The settlement…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.