Dulberg
Dulberg v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MARTIN DULBERG, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, No. C 17-00850 WHA Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., and AMENDMENT OF JUDGMENT RAISER, LLC, Defendants.
16 INTRODUCTION In this settled class action, plaintiff moves for amendment of the judgment pursuant to Rule 56(e) or for relief from judgment under Rule 60(b) on an issue decided twice before. No newly discoverable evidence is presented, no judicial mistake shown, no law changed, and no other justification for extraordinary relief made. The motion is DENIED. STATEMENT Prior orders detail the facts of the case and the history of settlement proposals (see, e.g., Dkt. Nos. 52, 169). Briefly, an order certified the class in February 2018. Six months later, plaintiff moved for preliminary approval of a class settlement. The settlement…