Cain

Cain v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 4, 20204:18-cv-06376California8,717 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ARTHUR CAIN, Case No. 18-cv-06376-DMR

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Re: Dkt. Nos. 15, 23 Defendant.

Plaintiff Arthur Lee Cain moves for summary judgment to reverse the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration’s (the “Commissioner’s”) final administrative decision, which found Cain not disabled and therefore denied his application for benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401 et seq. [Docket No. 15.] The Commissioner cross-moves to affirm. [Docket No. 23.] For the reasons stated below, the court denies Cain’s motion and grants the Commissioner’s motion. I. BACKGROUND Cain filed an application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) benefits on February 20, 2014, alleging disability beginning January 1, 1999. Administrative Record (“AR”) 177-198. He later amended his alleged onset date of disability to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.