Flentoil

Flentoil v. Santa Clara County Dept. of Corrections

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 5, 20203:18-cv-03486California8,837 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ERIC E. FLENTOIL, Case No. 18-cv-03486-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

SANTA CLARA COUNTY DEPT. OF JUDGMENT CORRECTIONS, et al., Docket No. 44 Defendants. 12 I. INTRODUCTION In this pro se prisoner’s civil rights action for damages, Eric Flentoil complains about his jailers’ handling of medical requests and ADA accommodations requests. Defendants have moved for summary judgment, which Mr. Flentoil has not opposed. For the reasons discussed below, Defendants’ motion for summary judgment will be granted as to the medical care claim and denied as to the ADA claim. The Court will refer this case to the Pro Se Prisoner Mediation Program. II. BACKGROUND There are two claims in this action: (1) a claim that Dr. Chyorny’s response to Mr. Flentoil’s pain violated Mr. Flentoil’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.