Razavi

Razavi v. Coti

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 6, 20205:17-cv-04341California843 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 MELINA RAZAVI, Case No. 17-cv-04341-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S LETTER OF

v. JANUARY 29, 2020

CARLOS COTI, an individual; and GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY, a business entity of unknown form,

Defendants.

14 On January 29, 2020, Plaintiff filed a letter providing addresses for service of process on Defendants, and raising a number of other issues. See Letter, ECF 23. The U.S. Marshal has been ordered to effect service of process on Defendants in a separate order. Among the other issues raised in the letter are Plaintiff’s request for a telephone call from a court attorney, Plaintiff’s assertion of misconduct by the undersigned, and the language used in the order screening Plaintiff’s operative third amended complaint. The Court addresses those issues as follows. Plaintiff’s Request for a Telephone Call from the Federal Pro Se Program Attorney Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.