Wilkins

Wilkins v. County of Contra Costa

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 7, 20203:16-cv-07016California962 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KEENAN G. WILKINS, Case No. 16-cv-07016-JD

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON MOTIONS

v. 9 Re: Dkt. Nos. 199, 206, 209, 210, 211, 216 DAVID O. LIVINGSTON, et al., Defendants.

12 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 10, 2019, defendants filed a motion to dismiss, that is now fully briefed, and the Court will address in due course. Plaintiff has filed several other motions. Plaintiff has requested Court certification for an interlocutory appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1292(b) with respect to his Monell claim that the Court denied at screening. This issue does not present a controlling question of law with a substantial ground for difference of opinion to warrant an interlocutory appeal. The request is denied. Plaintiff has also filed a request to take depositions by written questions of inmates in a different prison. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 31(a)(2)(B) requires leave of the Court if the deponent…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.