Molina Healthcare, Inc. v. Actavis Elizabeth, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 5, 20203:19-cv-08438California379 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

|

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL

on

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: GENERIC PHARMACEUTICALS

PRICING ANTITRUST LITIGATION MDL No. 2724

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —10)

On August 5, 2016, the Panel transferred 1 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 227 F.Supp.3d 1402 (J.P.M.L. 2016). Since that time, 48 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Cynthia M. Rufe. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and assigned to Judge Rufe. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for the reasons stated in the order of August 5, 2016,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.