Contreras

Contreras v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 20204:19-cv-00154California3,051 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CHRISTOPHER CONTRERAS, Case No. 19-cv-00154-KAW

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

v. JUDGMENT; DENYING

DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR

NANCY A BERRYHILL, SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 13,

12 Plaintiff Christopher Contreras seeks judicial review, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), of the Commissioner’s final decision, and the remand of this case for payment of benefits, or, in the alternative, for further proceedings. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and Defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment. Having considered the papers filed by the parties, and for the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, and DENIES Defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed for Title II disability benefits on July 17, 2014. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.