Jun
Johnson v. Jun
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
7 SCOTT JOHNSON, Case No. 19-cv-06474-BLF Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS
YOUN LEE AND JEONG AE LEE’S
10 v. MOTION TO DISMISS 11 IN SUK JUN et al., [Re: ECF 16] Defendants.
In this action, Plaintiff Scott Johnson asserts claims under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq., and the California Unruh Civil Rights Act (the “Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51-53. See generally Compl., ECF 1. Mr. Johnson seeks injunctive relief along with statutory damages, attorneys’ fees, and costs. Id. In response, Jung Youn Lee and Jeong Ae Lee (together, “Lee Defendants”)1 have filed this motion to dismiss. Mot. to Dismiss, ECF 16. Mr. Johnson opposes this motion. Opposition to Motion to Dismiss (“Opp’n.”), ECF 20. This matter was previously deemed suitable for determination without oral argument. See ECF 27. For the reasons…