Kimner
Kimner v. Capital Title of Texas, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
AUDREY L. KIMNER,
Case No. 5:19-cv-07576-EJD Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S v. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 10 MARGARET A. POISSANT, Re: Dkt. No. 14 11 Defendant.
On January 29, 2020, this Court determined that the Rooker-Feldman doctrine prevented Plaintiff Audrey Kimner from proceeding with her case and dismissed certain Defendants from the action. See Dkt. 13. The Court, however, granted Plaintiff leave to amend her complaint as to the one Defendant not affected by Rooker-Feldman. Id. On February 5, 2020, Plaintiff Audrey Kimner filed a Motion to Vacate, which asks the Court to vacate its decision to release certain Defendants. Dkt. 14. Thus, in essence, Plaintiff asks this Court to reconsider its earlier ruling. Accordingly, the Court interprets Plaintiff’s motion as a motion for reconsideration. See Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007)…