Siqueiros

Siqueiros v. General Motors LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 11, 20203:16-cv-07244California1,847 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MONTEVILLE SLOAN, et al., Case No. 16-cv-07244-EMC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

AND DISMISSING THE CLAIMS OF

GENERAL MOTORS LLC, ADDITIONAL PLAINTIFFS Defendant. Docket No. 221

12 13 I. INTRODUCTION Defendant General Motors (“GM” or “Defendant”) moves the Court for reconsideration of its order from February 7, 2018, specifically on the question “whether the Court has personal jurisdiction over the five out-of-state plaintiffs added in the second amended complaint.” Motion for Reconsideration (“Mot.”) at 1, Docket No. 221. Those five out-of-state Plaintiffs are Illinois Plaintiffs Edwin and Katelyn Doepel, New York Plaintiff Dennis Vita, Oregon Plaintiff William Martell, and Washington Plaintiff Kelly Harris. Id. at 2. The motion stems from the Court’s December 5, 2019 order, dismissing the claims of the Ohio Plaintiff for lack of personal 22 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.