King

King v. Bumble Trading, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 11, 20205:18-cv-06868California4,405 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 NICK KING, et al., Case No. 18-cv-06868-NC 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS; ORDER GRANTING BUMBLE TRADING, INC., et al., MOTIONS TO SEAL 14 Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 67, 78, 79 15 16 Pending before the Court is defendants Bumble Trading, Inc. and Bumble Holding, Ltd.’s motion to dismiss out-of-state plaintiffs’ claims for lack of personal jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2). See Dkt. No. 67 at 11–18. At issue is whether the Court has personal jurisdiction over the claims of the out-of-state named plaintiff, Brian Wess, and those of absent out-of-state class members. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendants’ motion to dismiss. The Court also GRANTS the parties’ administrative motions to seal. I. Background …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.