Castro

Castro v. Pascual

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 13, 20205:20-cv-01090California963 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 JOHN R. CASTRO, Case No. 20-cv-01090-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING APPLICATION

v. FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING

ORDER AND FOR EMERGENCY

JOHN PASCUAL, CONIE LEGASPI; HEARING

RONALD ALONZO; LAW OFFICE OF

MCCARTHY & HOLTHUS; QUALITY [Re: ECF 4]

LOAN SERVICE CORP.; AND

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Defendants.

14 15 Plaintiff John R. Castro (“Castro”), proceeding pro se, filed the complaint in this action on February 11, 2020. See Compl., ECF 1. The complaint challenges the alleged “non-judicial wrongful foreclosure” of property located at 630 E. Market Street, Salinas, California 93905 (“the Property”). See id. The complaint was accompanied by an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court has granted the application to proceed in forma pauperis in a separate order, and in that same order has screened Castro’s complaint as required under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.