Castro

Castro v. Pascual

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 13, 20205:20-cv-01090California1,260 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 JOHN R. CASTRO, Case No. 20-cv-01090-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS; SCREENING

JOHN PASCUAL; CONIE LEGASPI; COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C.

RONALD ALONZO; LAW OFFICE OF § 1915(E); AND DISMISSING

MCCARTHY & HOLTHUS; QUALITY COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO

LOAN SERVICE CORP.; AND AMEND

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., [Re: ECF 2] Defendants.

15 Plaintiff John R. Castro (“Castro”) filed this action on February 11, 2020, challenging the alleged “non-judicial wrongful foreclosure” of property located at 630 E. Market Street, Salinas, California 93905 (“the Property”). See Compl., ECF 1. On the same date, Castro filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP Application”). See IFP Applic., ECF 2. The IFP Application is GRANTED. A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening of any complaint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.