Castro
Castro v. Pascual
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 13, 20205:20-cv-01090California1,260 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 JOHN R. CASTRO, Case No. 20-cv-01090-BLF
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
v. APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN
FORMA PAUPERIS; SCREENING
JOHN PASCUAL; CONIE LEGASPI; COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C.
RONALD ALONZO; LAW OFFICE OF § 1915(E); AND DISMISSING
MCCARTHY & HOLTHUS; QUALITY COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO
LOAN SERVICE CORP.; AND AMEND
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., [Re: ECF 2] Defendants.
15 Plaintiff John R. Castro (“Castro”) filed this action on February 11, 2020, challenging the alleged “non-judicial wrongful foreclosure” of property located at 630 E. Market Street, Salinas, California 93905 (“the Property”). See Compl., ECF 1. On the same date, Castro filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP Application”). See IFP Applic., ECF 2. The IFP Application is GRANTED. A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening of any complaint…