Synchronoss Technologies v. Dropbox Inc

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SYNCHRONOSS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Case No. 16-cv-00119-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DROPBOX INC.'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 435, 436, 449, 461, 465 DROPBOX INC., et al., Defendants.

Pending before the Court is Defendant Dropbox, Inc.’s (“Dropbox”) motion for attorneys’ fees. Dkt. No. 436 (“Mot.”). The parties also filed motions to seal portions of their briefs and accompanying exhibits. Dkt. Nos. 435, 449, 461, and 465. For the reasons detailed below, the Court DENIES Dropbox’s motion for attorneys’ fees and GRANTS in part and DENIES in part the parties’ motions to seal. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. (“Synchronoss”) filed this action on March 27, 2015, in the Northern District of New Jersey, alleging infringement of United States Patent Nos. 6,671,757 (“the ’757 Patent”), 7,587,446 (“the ’446 Patent”) and 6,757,696 (“the ’696 Patent”). Dkt. No. 1. On December 30, 2015, Defendant’s…