Arnold
Arnold v. Attorney General Department of Justice
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARIE A ARNOLD, Case No. 19-cv-05147-SVK
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
v. MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Re: Dkt. No. 40 Defendant.
In this action, Marie Arnold (“Plaintiff”) alleges that the United States of America (“Defendant”) was negligent towards her family. See generally Dkt. 37. Before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s first amended complaint. Dkt. 40. All parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge. Dkts. 19, 27. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7- 1(b), the Court deems this motion suitable for determination without oral argument. Based on the Parties’ submissions and the relevant law, the Court GRANTS the motion to dismiss for the reasons discussed below. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff alleges that Defendant has been targeting and abusing her and her daughters. See generally Dkt. 37. Plaintiff asserts a…