Arnold
Arnold v. United States
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARIE A ARNOLD, Case No. 19-cv-04223-SVK
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
v. MOTION TO DISMISS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 42 Defendants.
In this action, Marie Arnold (“Plaintiff”) alleges that the United States of America and the Central Intelligence Agency (collectively, “Defendants”) engaged in various tortious and criminal acts against her and her daughters. See generally Dkt. 5 (“FAC”). Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss the first amended complaint. Dkt. 42. All parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge. Dkts. 21, 40. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court deems this motion suitable for determination without oral argument. Based on the Parties’ submissions, the case file, and the relevant law, the Court GRANTS the motion to dismiss for the reasons discussed below. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff alleges that Defendants have been…