Malloy

Malloy v. Regents of the University of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 20204:19-cv-07995California7,049 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 STEPHEN GROVE MALLOY, Case No. 19-cv-07995-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER SCREENING COMPLAINT

v. PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 11 Defendants.

13 I. INTRODUCTION On December 4, 2019, Plaintiff Stephen G. Malloy filed a complaint and an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court granted the application but found Malloy’s complaint failed to state a claim on which relief could be granted. The Court directed Malloy to file an amended complaint that addressed the deficiencies of his original complaint or risk dismissal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). This screening order addresses Malloy’s Amended Complaint, which he filed on January 30, 2020. ECF No. 7. II. BACKGROUND Malloy’s original complaint named 57 defendants and asserted causes of action under Titles VI and VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VI” and “Title VII”), the Age …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.