Love

Love v. Shops at Tanforan Associates, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 20203:19-cv-06787California414 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAMUEL LOVE,

Case No. 19-cv-06787-JCS Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION AND

SHOPS AT TANFORAN ASSOCIATES, VACATING MARCH 6, 2020 MOTION

LLC, et al., HEARING Defendants. Re: Dkt. No.

12 Plaintiff Samuel Love asserts claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., and California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act based on Defendants’ failure to provide accessible sales counters at Regis Salon, in San Bruno California. Presently before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (“Motion”). In the Motion, Defendants assert that this case is moot because the company that owned Regis Salon has ceased operations and the salon closed permanently on January 2, 2020. Therefore, they assert, there is no effective relief the Court could award Plaintiff in this action because injunctive relief is the only form or relief 20…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.