Love
Love v. Shops at Tanforan Associates, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAMUEL LOVE,
Case No. 19-cv-06787-JCS Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION AND
SHOPS AT TANFORAN ASSOCIATES, VACATING MARCH 6, 2020 MOTION
LLC, et al., HEARING Defendants. Re: Dkt. No.
12 Plaintiff Samuel Love asserts claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., and California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act based on Defendants’ failure to provide accessible sales counters at Regis Salon, in San Bruno California. Presently before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (“Motion”). In the Motion, Defendants assert that this case is moot because the company that owned Regis Salon has ceased operations and the salon closed permanently on January 2, 2020. Therefore, they assert, there is no effective relief the Court could award Plaintiff in this action because injunctive relief is the only form or relief 20…