Jones

Jones v. Jinparn

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 19, 20204:19-cv-02817California1,086 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION 8 AL D. JONES, et al, Case No: C 19-02817 SBA 9 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF AL JONES’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO vs. FILE A LATE OPPOSITION BRIEF 11 ADAM JINPARN, et al., Dkt. 56, 58 12 Defendants. 13 Plaintiffs Al D. Jones (“Al Jones”) and John W. Jones (“John Jones”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), proceeding pro se, bring the instant action against several individuals and entities, including Defendant Adam Jinparn, San Pablo Police Officer (“Officer Jinparn”), for the alleged mishandling of the remains of their deceased brother, Harleem Sweets. Plaintiffs initiated the instant action in the Contra Costa County Superior Court on March 1, 2019. After removing the action to this Court, Officer Jinparn filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). On December 19, 2019, the Court granted Officer Jinparn’s motion and dismissed the First, Second, Fifth, Sixth,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.