Gordon
Gordon v. Lizarraga
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CHARLES DAVID GORDON, Case No. 12-cv-00769-PJH Petitioner, ORDER DENYING FED.R.CIV.P. 59(e) v. MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND
JUDGMENT; VACATING MOTION
JOE A. LIZARRAGA, HEARING; DENYING MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO FILE RESPONSE TO
Respondent. OBJECTION TO EVIDENCE
13 Before the court is the motion to alter or amend judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) filed by represented petitioner Charles David Gordon, known as Angie Gordon. Dkt. 81 (“Mot.”). Respondent filed an opposition on February 3, 2020. Dkt. 86 (“Opp.”). Petitioner filed a reply on February 6, 2020. Dkt. 87. Respondent filed an objection to evidence submitted in support of the reply. Dkt. 88. Petitioner filed an administrative motion for leave to file a response to the objection to evidence. Dkt. 89. The court determines that the matter is suitable for decision without oral argument and is submitted on the papers. The motion hearing…