Gordon

Gordon v. Lizarraga

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 20204:12-cv-00769California1,696 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLES DAVID GORDON, Case No. 12-cv-00769-PJH Petitioner, ORDER DENYING FED.R.CIV.P. 59(e) v. MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND

JUDGMENT; VACATING MOTION

JOE A. LIZARRAGA, HEARING; DENYING MOTION FOR

LEAVE TO FILE RESPONSE TO

Respondent. OBJECTION TO EVIDENCE

13 Before the court is the motion to alter or amend judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) filed by represented petitioner Charles David Gordon, known as Angie Gordon. Dkt. 81 (“Mot.”). Respondent filed an opposition on February 3, 2020. Dkt. 86 (“Opp.”). Petitioner filed a reply on February 6, 2020. Dkt. 87. Respondent filed an objection to evidence submitted in support of the reply. Dkt. 88. Petitioner filed an administrative motion for leave to file a response to the objection to evidence. Dkt. 89. The court determines that the matter is suitable for decision without oral argument and is submitted on the papers. The motion hearing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.