Frost

Frost v. Office of the United States Attorney

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 19, 20203:19-cv-05190California808 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 VINTON FROST, Case No. 19-cv-05190-EMC

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR SUBSTITION AND

v. DISMISSAL; AND DENYING

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

SARA WINSLOW, et al., SANCTIONS AND REQUEST FOR

LEAVE TO PETITION DIRECTLY TO

Defendants. SCOTUS

Docket Nos. 31, 38, and

13 Plaintiff Vinton Frost, proceeding pro se, filed this lawsuit against Civil Chief Sara Winslow and seven other defendants, most of whom are U.S. Attorneys. See Docket No. 1. On February 13, 2020, the Court held a hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for Sanctions and Defendants’ Motion for Substitution of Defendants and Dismissal. Each motion is discussed in turn, below. Because the Attorney General, through the Chief of the Civil Division of the United States Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of California, has certified that the individual defendants in this case were…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.