Russell

Russell v. Davis

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 14, 20203:18-cv-05527California2,385 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ROBERT G. RUSSELL, AK4805, Case No. 18-cv-05527-CRB (PR)

Petitioner,

ORDER DENYING PETITION

v. FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS

CORPUS

RON DAVIS, Warden, Respondent(s).

Petitioner Robert G. Russell, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and currently incarcerated at San Quentin State Prison, seeks a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging the state courts’ denial of his 2013 and 2018 petitions requesting resentencing pursuant to Proposition 36. For the reasons set forth below, the petition for a writ of habeas corpus will be denied. I. BACKGROUND A. Three Strikes Reform Act – Proposition 36 Under the Three Strikes Law originally enacted in 1994, a defendant convicted of any felony who had two prior convictions for serious or violent felonies was subject to a twenty-five years to life sentence. People v. Conley, 63 Cal. 4th 646, 651 (2016). On November 7, 2012, Proposition 36, also known as the Three Strikes…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.