Brooke

Brooke v. Rihh LP

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 20203:19-cv-06852California2,733 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 THERESA BROOKE, Case No. 19-cv-06852-SI

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S

MOTION TO DISMISS

RIHH LP, Re: Dkt. No. 6 Defendant.

13 On November 27, 2019, Defendant RIHH LP filed the instant motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. Dkt. No. 6 (Motion to Dismiss). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b) the Court hereby vacates the February 21, 2020, hearing and the motion is hereby GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. 18 BACKGROUND Plaintiff Teresa Brooke, a resident of Pinal County, Arizona, is a disabled woman confined to a wheelchair. Dkt. No. 1 ¶ 1 (Complaint). Mrs. Brooke alleges she frequently travels to California for “purposes of leisure travel, hearings, settlement conferences, ENE conferences, joint site inspections and to determine if various hotels across the Country comply with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.