Enea

Enea v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 19, 20204:18-cv-02792California879 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GIORGIO ENEA, Case No. 18-cv-02792-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE

v. UNDER SEAL

MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 74 Defendants.

12 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s administrative motion to file documents under seal. Dkt. No. 74. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s administrative motion. I. LEGAL STANDARD Courts generally apply a “compelling reasons” standard when considering motions to seal documents. Pintos v. Pac. Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 678 (9th Cir. 2010) (quoting Kamakana v. City & Cty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006)). “This standard derives from the common law right ‘to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.’” Id. (quoting Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1178). “[A] strong presumption in favor of access is the starting point.” …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.