In Re Koninklijke Philips Patent Litigation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 IN RE KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS PATENT Case No. 18-cv-01885-HSG
LITIGATION
ORDER ON ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTIONS TO FILE UNDER SEAL
9 This Document Relates To: Re: Dkt. Nos. 702, 704, 705, 708, 714, 715, 719, 721, 728, 730, 732, 743, 794, 795, 798,
ALL ACTIONS 800, 802, 808, 809, 811, 814, 817, 819, 821,
823, 874, 876, 878, 879, 882, 885, 890, 897, 902, 904, 906 12 Pending before the Court are the parties’ administrative motions to file under seal portions of documents in connection motions for partial summary judgment and Daubert motions filed by Philips, HTC, and Microsoft (thirty-six sealing motions in total). The Court GRANTS the motions to file under seal. I. LEGAL STANDARD Courts generally apply a “compelling reasons” standard when considering motions to seal documents. Pintos v. Pac. Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 678 (9th Cir. 2010) (quoting Kamakana v. City & Cty. of…