Fujita

Fujita v. The Best Service Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 19, 20204:19-cv-00580California641 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND DIVISION

7 KEIKI KAY MITSU FUJITA, Case No: C 19-00580 SBA 8 Plaintiff, ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE vs. 10 THE BEST SERVICE COMPANY, et al., 11 Defendants.

Defendant Hunt & Henriques shall file its motion for summary judgment by no later than March 16, 2020. Plaintiff shall file her opposition by no later than April 6, 2020, and Defendant shall file its reply by no later than April 13, 2020. The motion shall be noticed for hearing on May 13, 2020 at 2:00 p.m. However, the Court may decide the motion without a hearing, in which case no appearance is required. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; Civ. L.R. 7- 1(b). The parties are advised the check the Court’s website to determine whether the motion is on calendar. For Plaintiff’s benefit, the Court notes that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 provides that a party may move for summary judgment on some or all of the claims or defenses presented in an action. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a)(1). “[S]ummary judgment is appropriate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.