Lloyd
Lloyd v. Mullenex
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 KENNETH LLOYD, Case No.19-cv-03360-NC Plaintiff, ORDER OF CONDITIONAL
DISMISSAL
S Re: Dkt. No.
E KEVIN MULLENEX
13 Defendant.
Q The Court having been notified of the settlement of this action, and it appearing that 17 || no issue remains for the Court’s determination, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this
|} action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the 19 || Court is directed to administratively close this case. Any party may move to reopen the 20 || case, provided that such motion is filed within 45 days. All scheduled dates are || VACATED. The Court retains jurisdiction over this case for 45 days. See Kokkonen v. Guardian || Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381 (1994). IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 || Dated: February 19, 2020 hGe<——— —_—>