Yes on Prop B, Committee in Support of the Earthquake Safety and Emergency Response Bond v. City and County of San Francisco

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 20, 20203:20-cv-00630California6,409 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

25 Under California law, any person or group of people that raises at least $2,000 or spends at 26 least $1,000 for political purposes in a given year must register as a committee. Cal. Gov’t Code 27 § 82013. Political advertising by committees is subject to a plethora of disclaimer and disclosure 1 requirements under California and San Francisco law. See, e.g. Cal. Gov’t Code §§ 84200, 2 84200.5, 84202.3, 84203, 84502; see also, e.g. SF Code § 1.161. 3 This case concerns two new disclaimer requirements for committee advertising that went 4 into effect in San Francisco last year. First, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors amended San 5 Francisco’s Campaign and Governmental Conduct Code to require a spoken disclaimer at the 6 beginning (rather than the end) of any audio or video advertisement. See SF Code § 1.161(a)(5); 7 see also Yes on Prop B RJN1 (dkt. 5-1) Ex. B. 8 Last November, San Francisco voters amended the City’s disclaimer laws by approving 9 Proposition F. See generally Yes on Prop B RJN Ex. C at 112–13. Proposition F passed with 10 76.89% of the vote. San Francisco RJN Ex. B at 6. Now, all ads paid for by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.