Sumotext Corp. -v- Zoove, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 20, 20205:16-cv-01370California870 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 SUMOTEXT CORP., Case No. 16-cv-01370-BLF

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S v. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO LIFT

PROTECTIVE ORDER AS TO

ZOOVE, INC., et al., DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPTS Defendants. [ECF 430]

12 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to lift the protective order as to all deposition transcripts that were previously designated Attorneys’ Eyes Only (“AEO”) under the Protective Order in this case, ECF 205. See ECF 430 at 2. Specifically, Plaintiff says that it “intends to use deposition testimony to impeach testimony and refresh the memories of witnesses as necessary at trial.” Id. Because Defendants did not file a motion to seal any deposition transcripts, Plaintiff believes that Defendants “may no longer maintain their formal or informal AEO designations on transcripts.” Id. Plaintiff also alleges that many depositions were “never formally designated” as …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.