Camilli

Camilli v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 20, 20203:18-cv-06322California1,217 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LINDA RENEE CAMILLI, Case No. 18-cv-06322-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: MOTION FOR

v. ATTORNEY’S FEES

ANDREW M. SAUL, Re: Dkt. No. 22 Defendant.

12 Plaintiff’s counsel, Helen Zane, moves for attorney’s fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) for representing Plaintiff in her successful appeal of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration’s (“Commissioner’s”) denial of social security disability benefits. (Dkt. Nos. 22 & 23.) The Commissioner has not filed a response to Plaintiff’s motion and the time to do so has run. After careful consideration of Plaintiff’s motion and the relevant legal authority, the Court GRANTS the motion for attorney’s fees pursuant to Section 406(b). BACKGROUND This case stems from Plaintiff’s appeal of the SSA’s denial of social security benefits for a combination of mental and physical impairments, including: degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.