Monteith

Monteith v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 17, 20204:18-cv-04481California1,859 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CINDY LAURAL MONTEITH,

Case No. 18-cv-04481-DMR Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY, Re: Dkt. Nos. 15, 24 Defendant.

Plaintiff Cindy Monteith moves for summary judgment to reverse the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration’s (the “Commissioner’s”) final administrative decision, which found Monteith not disabled and therefore denied her application for benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401 et seq. [Docket Nos. 15 (“Mot.”); 25 (“Reply”).] The Commissioner cross-moves to affirm. [Docket No. 24 (“Opp.”).] For the reasons stated below, the court grants Monteith’s motion for summary judgment, denies the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment, and remands this case for further consideration. I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Monteith filed an application for Social…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.