Uberti

Uberti v. Sonoma County Board of Supervisors

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 21, 20203:19-cv-04025California853 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GEORGE CHRISTOPHER UBERTI, Plaintiff, No. C 19-04025 WHA

v.

VALERIE BROWN, SUSAN GORIN, MICHAEL ORDER GRANTING

KERNS, DAVID RABBITT, TIMOTHY SMITH, DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

SHIRLEE ZANE, PAUL KELLEY, MICHAEL TO DISMISS AND MCGUIRE, JAMES GORE, MICHAEL REILLY, DENYING PLAINTIFF'S EFREN CARRILLO, LYNDA HOPKINS, RODNEY MOTION FOR SUMMARY

DOLE, DONNA DUNK, DAVID SUNDSTROM, JUDGMENT

ERICK ROESER, ROBERT BOITANO, PAMELA TORILATT, and JONATHAN KADLEC, 17 Defendants.

19 In this Sherman Act action by a pro se plaintiff, a county consolidation of government offices is not an action of “trade or commerce,” so the claim must be dismissed. STATEMENT Pro se plaintiff raised two antitrust claims against agents of the County of Sonoma following their decision in 2006 to consolidate the County Offices of the Auditor-Controller with the Treasurer-Tax Collector into the Office of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.