Uberti
Uberti v. Sonoma County Board of Supervisors
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 21, 20203:19-cv-04025California853 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
GEORGE CHRISTOPHER UBERTI, Plaintiff, No. C 19-04025 WHA
v.
VALERIE BROWN, SUSAN GORIN, MICHAEL ORDER GRANTING
KERNS, DAVID RABBITT, TIMOTHY SMITH, DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
SHIRLEE ZANE, PAUL KELLEY, MICHAEL TO DISMISS AND MCGUIRE, JAMES GORE, MICHAEL REILLY, DENYING PLAINTIFF'S EFREN CARRILLO, LYNDA HOPKINS, RODNEY MOTION FOR SUMMARY
DOLE, DONNA DUNK, DAVID SUNDSTROM, JUDGMENT
ERICK ROESER, ROBERT BOITANO, PAMELA TORILATT, and JONATHAN KADLEC, 17 Defendants.
19 In this Sherman Act action by a pro se plaintiff, a county consolidation of government offices is not an action of “trade or commerce,” so the claim must be dismissed. STATEMENT Pro se plaintiff raised two antitrust claims against agents of the County of Sonoma following their decision in 2006 to consolidate the County Offices of the Auditor-Controller with the Treasurer-Tax Collector into the Office of the…