IN RE CAPACITORS ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 21, 20203:14-cv-03264California1,912 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 IN RE CAPACITORS ANTITRUST MDL Case No. 17-md-02801-JD

LITIGATION

Case No. 14-cv-03264-JD

OMNIBUS ORDER RE DAUBERT

MOTIONS AND MOTION FOR

DECERTIFICATION

Re: Dkt. Nos. 647, 661, 669, 672, 992

13

I. DIRECT PURCHASER CLASS’S MOTION TO PARTIALLY EXCLUDE

PROPOSED EXPERT TESTIMONY OF JANUSZ A. ORDOVER (MDL #669) GRANTED. The DPPs move to exclude Ordover’s opinion that “[t]he episodes of price fixing to which NCC has pled guilty are unlikely to have had broad impacts given features of the marketplace.” Dkt. No. 667-4 at 1. DPPs object to this opinion because of its premise as stated by Ordover: “Although NCC pled guilty to fixing prices of ‘certain electrolytic capacitors’ in its plea agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice, [] counsel for NCC has informed me that the episodes of price fixing to which NCC pled guilty all involve prices for a narrow set of products or …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.