Sprint Spectrum Realty Company, LLC v. Hartkopf, Jr.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 24, 20203:19-cv-03099California1,697 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SPRINT SPECTRUM REALTY Case No. 19-cv-03099-JSC

COMPANY, LLC,

8 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND v. AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM 10 WILLIAM F. HARTKOPF, JR., Re: Dkt. No. 41 11 Defendant.

12 Sprint Spectrum Realty Company, LLC (“Sprint”) sues William F. Hartkopf, Jr. seeking declaratory judgment and other relief arising out of a lease of real property owned by Mr. Hartkopf. (Dkt. No. 1.) Mr. Hartkopf brings counterclaims against Sprint seeking declaratory judgment and other relief for breach of contract, breach of good faith and fair dealing, and unjust enrichment. (Dkt. No. 27.) Now before the Court is Mr. Hartkopf’s motion for leave to file second amended counterclaim. (Dkt. No. 41.) After careful consideration of the parties’ briefing, the Court concludes that oral argument is not necessary, and DENIES Mr. Hartkopf’s motion because the requested amendment would be futile. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.