Doe

Doe v. White

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 24, 20203:19-cv-04923California8,549 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 JANE DOE, Case No. 19-cv-04923-SI

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT

LEAVE TO AMEND

TIMOTHY WHITE, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 24 Defendants.

10 11 On January 29, 2020, the Court held a hearing on defendants’ motion to dismiss. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the motion without leave to amend the complaint. 14 BACKGROUND This lawsuit arises out of a Title IX investigation into alleged sexual harassment/misconduct by plaintiff Jane Doe while she was a graduate student at Sonoma State University. Plaintiff was enrolled in Sonoma State University’s two-year master’s program in Depth Psychology beginning September 2016. Compl. ¶ 26 (Dkt. No. 1). Plaintiff alleges that defendants denied her procedural due process by effectively suspending her for an academic school year while the investigation took place. Defendant Timothy White is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.