Pacumio

Pacumio v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 24, 20203:20-cv-00251California2,256 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOSEFINA PACUMIO, Case No. 20-cv-00251-JCS

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. REMAND

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 6 Defendants.

I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Josefina Pacumio brought this action against Defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”), Clear Recon Corp. (“Clear Recon”), and Catamount Properties 2018, LLC (“Catamount”) in the California Superior Court for the County of San Francisco, where it was assigned case number CGC-119-580703, challenging a foreclosure sale of property that Pacumio owned. After Pacumio voluntarily dismissed her claims against Catamount, Wells Fargo removed to this Court, asserting diversity jurisdiction on the basis that Clear Recon is fraudulently joined as a defendant. The Court finds the matter suitable for resolution without oral argument and VACATES the hearing set for March 13, 2020. For the reasons discussed below, Pacumio’s motion to remand is GRANTED. Lacking…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.