Dorfman

Peak Health Center v. Dorfman

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 24, 20205:19-cv-04145California7,454 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 PEAK HEALTH CENTER, Case No. 19-cv-04145-VKD

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT; GRANTING ANTI-

BRANDON DORFMAN, SLAPP MOTION TO STRIKE Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 44,

13 With the Court’s leave, on November 26, 2019, plaintiff Peak Health Center (“Peak Health”) filed a second amended complaint (“SAC”) against defendant Brandon Dorfman for the following: (1) trade libel; (2) intentional interference with prospective economic advantage; and (3) negligent interference with prospective economic advantage. Dkt. No. 37. This Court has jurisdiction over this diversity action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Id. ¶¶ 1-2, 9. Mr. Dorfman now moves to dismiss the SAC pursuant to Rules 9(b) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and asks the Court to take judicial notice of certain materials in support of that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.