Cypress Semiconductor Corporation v. Fujitsu Semiconductor Limited

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 20205:20-cv-00193California1,926 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR Case No. 20-CV-00193-LHK

CORPORATION,

ORDER DENYING APPLICATION

Plaintiff,

FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING

ORDER AND PRELIMINARY

v.

INJUNCTION

15 FUJITSU SEMICONDUCTOR LIMITED, Re: Dkt. No. 8 16 Defendant. 17 Before the Court is Plaintiff Cypress Semiconductor Corporation’s (“Cypress”) ex parte application for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) and preliminary injunction (“TRO Application”). ECF No. 8. Because the Court found that proceeding ex parte was unwarranted, the Court ordered Plaintiff to serve Defendant Fujitsu Semiconductor Limited (“FSL”) with the TRO Application on January 9, 2020. ECF No. 11. Following service, FSL entered a special appearance to oppose the TRO Application on January 22, 2020. ECF No. 19 (“Opp’n”). Cypress filed a reply on January 28, 2020, ECF No. 22 (“Reply”). Having considered the submissions of the parties, the relevant law, and the record in this case, the Court DENIES Cypress’s application for a TRO…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.