N.F.

N.F. v. Antioch Unified School District

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 20204:19-cv-02453California2,060 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 N.F., a minor, by and through his Guardian Case No. 4:19-cv-02453-KAW Ad Litem, MELANIE FLYTE, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND Plaintiff, DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE v. ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD 10 ANTIOCH UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Re: Dkt. Nos. 29-1 11 Defendant. 12 On November 19, 2019, Plaintiff N.F., by and through his guardian ad litem, filed a motion to supplement the administrative record. (Pl.’s Mot., Dkt. No. 29-1.) On February 20, 2020, the Court held a hearing, and after careful consideration of the parties’ arguments and the applicable legal authority, for the reasons set forth below, GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Plaintiff’s motion to supplement the administrative record. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff and Defendant Antioch Unified School District (“AUSD” or “District”) participated in an administrative due process hearing on December 11, 12,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.