DSS Technology Management, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 26, 20204:14-cv-05330California1,177 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DSS TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, Case No. 14-cv-05330-HSG

INC.,

ORDER ON ADMINISTRATIVE Plaintiff, MOTIONS TO SEAL 9 v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 222, 235, 243, 257, 261, 262, 10 267, 269, 275, 303, 311, 313, 319, 321, 323,

APPLE, INC.,

325, 327, 333, 358, 360, 362, 365, 366, 403, Defendant. 405 12 Pending before the Court are the parties’ administrative motions to file under seal portions of documents in connection with the parties’ motions for (partial) summary judgment, Daubert motions, and motions in limine as well as Apple’s motion for leave to file an amended answer. (twenty-five sealing motions in total). The Court GRANTS the motions to file under seal. I. LEGAL STANDARD Courts generally apply a “compelling reasons” standard when considering motions to seal documents. Pintos v. Pac. Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 678 (9th Cir. 2010) (quoting Kamakana v. City & Cty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.