In Re Pacific Fertility Center Litigation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 A.B., et al., Case No. 18-cv-01586-JSC
Plaintiffs,
ORDER RE: ADMINISTRATIVE
v. MOTIONS TO SEAL
PACIFIC FERTILITY CENTER, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 301, 312, 352, 356, 369, 377, Defendants. 381, 383, 385, 392
12 In this negligence and products liability action Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification and Chart’s motion to strike certain of Plaintiffs’ experts (“Daubert motion”) are now pending before the Court. In connection with these motions, the parties filed 10 administrative motions to seal. (Dkt. Nos. 301, 312, 352, 356, 369, 377, 381, 383, 385, 392.) For the reasons explained below, these motions are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. LEGAL STANDARD “[T]he courts of this country recognize a general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.” Nixon v. Warner Comm’ns, Inc., 435U.S. 589, 597 n.7 (1978); see also Foltz v.…